← Back to Blog

CTV Advertising Benchmarks 2026: CPMs, Completion Rates, and ROAS by Industry

U.S. CTV ad spend hits $38B in 2026 and CPMs run 2-4x linear TV. Here are the connected TV benchmarks - CPMs, VCR, and ROAS - for eight industries.

North American Media Experts

10 min read

Connected TV is no longer the "emerging" channel media planners hedge with $20,000 test budgets. U.S. CTV ad spend is on pace to clear $38 billion in 2026, according to EMARKETER's December 2025 forecast, and the IAB projects 13.8% growth this year — second only to social. For the first time, CTV upfront commitments (~$17.7B) will exceed primetime linear TV upfronts (~$17.0B). The channel has graduated, and the question on every media director's desk is no longer "should we test CTV?" but "are our CTV numbers any good?"

This post answers that question. We pulled the most credible 2026 benchmarks from EMARKETER, IAB, Magna, Tatari, Adwave, FreeWheel, Skai, and Tinuiti, then layered in what we see across client accounts at North American Media Experts. The result is a working set of CTV advertising benchmarks for 2026 you can actually plan against — CPMs, video completion rates, ROAS, frequency, and incrementality — broken out by industry where the data supports it.

Why CTV benchmarks matter more in 2026 than they did in 2024

Two years ago, CTV was sold on reach and brand lift, and most advertisers measured it on reach and brand lift. That window is closed. Three things changed simultaneously:

  • Inventory exploded. Prime Video's ad tier, Netflix's expansion, Disney+/Hulu integration, Max, Peacock, Paramount+, and the entire FAST ecosystem (Tubi, Pluto, Roku Channel, Samsung TV Plus) flooded the market with impressions. Supply growth has compressed top-of-market CPMs and pulled mid-market CPMs into a tight band.
  • Measurement matured. Shoppable formats on Amazon, Roku, and LG, identity resolution via UID2 and IAB Tech Lab standards, and clean-room integrations with retailer data have turned CTV into a measurable performance channel — not just an awareness channel.
  • Budget gravity shifted. The Adworldnews 2026 advertiser survey found that roughly 70% of CTV advertisers are raising budgets this year. When that many buyers move the same direction, "average" performance becomes a moving target. Knowing where the bar actually sits in May 2026 is the difference between defending your plan and getting cut.

If you have not refreshed your benchmark deck since last year, almost every number in it is now stale. Here is the current picture.

CTV CPM benchmarks for 2026: what good looks like

CTV pricing in 2026 sits in two clear tiers, with a long tail underneath. Aggregated across Adwave's 2026 update, R-Advertising's TV instream report, and what we see in DSP buys for clients:

  • FAST and broad AVOD inventory: $15–$25 CPM. This is where most performance-led CTV dollars land in 2026. Roku Channel, Tubi, Pluto, and Samsung TV Plus dominate this tier.
  • Premium AVOD (Hulu, Peacock, Max, Paramount+, Prime Video): $25–$45 CPM for standard programmatic, $45–$65 CPM for direct-sold premium pods and live sports adjacency.
  • Audience-targeted buys with first-party or retailer data: $45–$85 CPM. The "addressable" premium adds 25–60% on top of programmatic open-market pricing — and it is usually worth it.
  • Linear TV comparison point: Tatari and FreeWheel data put broadcast/cable linear CPMs in the $10–$15 range in 2026, with daypart spikes for live sports and primetime news.

The headline takeaway: CTV CPMs run roughly 2x to 4x linear TV CPMs for comparable reach. That premium is only defensible if you are using CTV's actual advantages — household-level targeting, frequency capping, and digital-style attribution. If you are buying CTV as "linear plus internet," you are paying the premium and getting none of the upside. For a deeper breakdown of how programmatic pricing stacks across CPM, CPC, and CPV formats, see our analysis of programmatic advertising costs in 2026.

Video completion rate (VCR) benchmarks: the metric that separates real CTV from "CTV"

Video completion rate is the cleanest signal of CTV ad quality. Unskippable inventory on a big-screen TV produces completion rates digital video advertisers can only dream about.

  • Average CTV VCR in 2026: 94–97% across premium AVOD inventory.
  • Pre-roll completion (optimized campaigns): 85–92%.
  • Mid-roll completion (premium AVOD): 94%+ — the highest-completion slot in the digital video ecosystem.
  • FAST channel completion: 88–93%, slightly lower because of session-level churn.
  • YouTube TV / connected YouTube on the big screen: 75–85% on skippable in-stream, 90%+ on bumpers and non-skippable.

If your CTV vendor is reporting completion rates below 85% on premium AVOD inventory, ask hard questions. Either the placements are not what they were sold as, or the campaign is running on long-tail FAST inventory mislabeled as premium. We have seen both — and the easy fix is a private marketplace deal with completion-rate floors baked into the agreement.

CTV CPM benchmarks by industry

Industry CPM variance on CTV is narrower than it is on paid search, but it is real. Inventory price is mostly set by audience demand, so verticals competing for the same affluent households pay more.

  • Financial services and insurance: $38–$55 CPM. The highest-paying vertical on CTV in 2026, driven by Medicare AEP, auto insurance, and wealth-management bidding for 35–64 high-income households.
  • Auto: $32–$48 CPM. OEM tier-one campaigns and dealer-association co-op buys push pricing up in Q3 and Q4 for model-year launches.
  • Pharma and healthcare: $30–$45 CPM. Disease-state targeting and condition-based audiences command a steady premium.
  • Retail and e-commerce: $22–$35 CPM. Heaviest demand mid-October through December — expect a 20–35% Q4 CPM lift versus Q1.
  • CPG and food/beverage: $18–$28 CPM. Reach-led plans live here, and CPG is the biggest beneficiary of retail-media CTV integrations on Amazon and Walmart Connect.
  • Travel and hospitality: $20–$32 CPM, with seasonal Q1 and late-summer spikes.
  • Direct-to-consumer (DTC) brands: $20–$30 CPM. DTC has become CTV's "performance native" advertiser, leaning hard on shoppable formats and lower-funnel measurement.
  • B2B and SaaS: $35–$50 CPM. Smaller audiences, higher targeting precision, smaller waste. CTV finally works for B2B in 2026 because identity resolution lets you target known account lists at the household level.

Two notes on reading these numbers. First, these are media CPMs — they exclude DSP fees, data costs, and verification, which together typically add another 18–30% to your loaded CPM. Second, these are open-market and programmatic guaranteed rates. Upfront-committed inventory and private marketplaces can come in 10–20% lower in exchange for volume commitments.

CTV ROAS by industry: the new performance benchmarks

For most of CTV's history, the honest answer to "what is good ROAS?" was "we don't really measure it." That excuse is over. Shoppable CTV, attention-based attribution, and clean-room measurement now let advertisers tie streaming exposure to downstream commerce. From Skai's 2026 State of Retail Media DSP report, Tinuiti's retail-media trends analysis, and account-level data we collect on our clients, here is the realistic 2026 ROAS picture:

  • Retail and CPG via retail-media CTV (Amazon, Walmart Connect, Target Roundel): 3.5x–5.0x measured ROAS, with leading CPG brands hitting 4.2x on average. The retail-media CTV channel is growing roughly 45% year-over-year.
  • DTC e-commerce (open-web CTV with last-touch + MMM blend): 2.0x–3.5x ROAS. Add in view-through windows of 7–14 days to capture CTV's actual lift.
  • Travel and hospitality: 4.0x–7.0x on direct bookings when paired with retargeting on display and paid search.
  • Financial services (lead-based ROI): $80–$250 CPA on qualified leads; ROAS is hard to express as a single multiplier because LTVs vary wildly.
  • Auto (test-drive bookings): $35–$90 cost per scheduled test-drive when CTV is paired with retargeting and address-level attribution.
  • B2B SaaS (MQL/SQL pipeline): 1.5x–2.5x measured ROAS over 90 days, with another 0.8x–1.5x typically attributable via incrementality testing that last-touch misses.

The honest framing: if you are running CTV as a standalone last-touch channel, you will underestimate its ROAS by 30–60%. CTV is an upstream channel that lifts the conversion rate of everything downstream. The brands beating these benchmarks are not running CTV harder — they are measuring it correctly, with a blend of MMM, incrementality tests, and platform-level attribution. Our perspective on why measurement frameworks have to shift toward owned signal is in our piece on why first-party data is the future of digital advertising.

Frequency, reach, and incrementality benchmarks

The three CTV operational levers that move performance most in 2026 are frequency capping, reach extension, and incrementality testing. Here is what the data says about each.

Frequency. The best-performing CTV campaigns in our portfolio cap at 3–5 impressions per household per week. SpotlightIQ's 2026 analysis aligns with this, finding that frequency capping reduces ad fatigue by roughly 22%. Above 5 impressions per week, ad recall plateaus and brand-sentiment scores start dropping. Below 3, you are not building enough memory to move purchase intent.

Incremental reach. FreeWheel and Adtaxi both report that layering CTV on top of a linear TV plan produces up to 32% higher unique reach, mostly from cord-cutters and light-TV households. That is the highest-yield incremental reach math in television, and it is the strongest argument for the CTV premium over linear.

Incrementality. Brands running formal hold-out tests report that CTV drives 2x–3x higher awareness lift than comparable linear-TV spend (per AI Digital and FreeWheel measurement studies). For lower-funnel KPIs, incrementality typically shows a 10–25% true lift on conversions that last-touch attribution would credit to paid search or organic.

If you have never run an incrementality test on CTV, that is the single highest-ROI piece of measurement work you can do in the back half of 2026. The right test design is the difference between defending and growing your CTV budget in next year's planning cycle.

Creative benchmarks: where most of the gap is hiding

Adworldnews reports that even with 70% of advertisers raising CTV budgets, the creative gap is widening — most brands are still recycling 30-second TV spots designed for linear. CTV is a different medium. The benchmarks that separate top-quartile from median performance:

  • Optimal length: 15–30 seconds for prospecting, 6–15 seconds for retargeting and frequency layers.
  • Branding in first 5 seconds: top-quartile creators surface the brand within the opening 5 seconds; median creators wait until second 18.
  • QR codes and shoppable overlays: add 0.4–1.2 percentage points of attributable conversion when implemented well.
  • Audio-on assumption: CTV is audio-on by default (unlike paid social). Sound design matters; muted-friendly social creative wastes the medium.

For more on what is changing in creative this year, see our take on creative strategy trends reshaping digital advertising in 2026, or talk to our creative strategy team about building CTV-native cutdowns from your existing brand assets.

How to act on these CTV benchmarks

Three concrete moves for the next 30 days.

1. Re-baseline your current CTV plan against these numbers. Pull your last 90 days of CTV reporting. Compare loaded CPM (not media CPM), VCR by publisher, frequency distribution, and whatever ROAS or CPA proxy you have. Anything more than 20% off these benchmarks deserves a root-cause conversation with your DSP or vendor.

2. Restructure your buy across the two CTV tiers. Most under-performing CTV plans buy a single blended package. The plans that beat benchmarks split the buy: a reach layer on FAST and broad AVOD at $18–$25 CPM, plus an addressable layer with first-party or retailer data on premium AVOD at $40–$60 CPM. The blended performance is materially better than either tier alone. Our framework for thinking about channel layering across CTV, paid social, and programmatic display is laid out in our guide to choosing the right paid social vs. programmatic channel mix.

3. Build a CTV incrementality test into Q3. Most advertisers can run a geo-based hold-out for 4–6 weeks with no media-spend reduction overall, just a reallocation. The test will give you a true-lift number you can defend to the CFO, and it will almost always justify raising the CTV budget for 2027 planning. If you need help structuring the test cleanly, our audience targeting team does this work every week.

The benchmarks are useful, but the plan beats the benchmarks

Benchmarks tell you where the bar sits today. They do not tell you what will move your numbers above the bar. The brands beating the 2026 CTV averages share four habits: they buy in two tiers instead of one, they cap frequency at 3–5 per week, they measure with incrementality not last-touch, and they refresh creative for the medium rather than recycling linear spots. That is not a benchmark — that is a playbook.

If you want a second set of eyes on your current CTV plan, your audience strategy, or your measurement setup, our team at North American Media Experts builds, buys, and measures CTV programs across all the major DSPs and retail-media networks. We are happy to walk through your numbers, show you where you are relative to the benchmarks above, and recommend the changes most likely to move the next quarter. Request a quote and a free CTV plan review and we will be in touch within one business day.

See all articles →